![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/d592f9_1d9a7e8d9aa246368487b74263a10baa~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_980,h_495,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_auto/d592f9_1d9a7e8d9aa246368487b74263a10baa~mv2.png)
Within the reading, the quote "In line with the focus on glitches, researchers tend to concentrate on how the internet perpetuates or mediates racial prejudice at the individual level rather than analyze how racism shapes infrastructure and design" is what stood out to me. Glitches are often viewed as isolated incidents that occur when the internet fails to function correctly. However, these glitches can have far-reaching consequences, especially when they reinforce existing racial biases. For example, prediction modeling algorithms used in online advertising can inadvertently perpetuate racial stereotypes, leading to discriminatory outcomes. To truly understand how racism shapes the internet, researchers must analyze the social and legal codes that underpin online infrastructure and design. This includes considering how algorithms and other design elements may perpetuate biases and discrimination.Researchers must also consider the ways in which exposure to certain types of content and online environments can lead to the normalization of racial prejudice. It is essential to recognize that racism is not simply an individual-level phenomenon but is also embedded in the social and legal structures that underpin online environments. Therefore, researchers must analyze how legal and regulatory frameworks impact the design and operation of the internet, and how these frameworks may perpetuate or exacerbate racial disparities. As shown in the picture above, there is not an understanding of inclusion or the purpose.
Comments